Alisa Valdes on Tea Party vs immigration rights coverage: "the news media’s love of white country folk is bottomless"

Four years ago, when literally millions of Americans took to the streets to support the human and civil rights of immigrants and, by association in the public mind, Latinos, the news media scarcely covered the marches - even though they’d drawn larger crowds than any other marches in the history of the nation, including the oft-dramatized “halmark” culture-changing protests over the Vietnam War.

Fast forward four years, to the Tea Party Convention, which boasted all of 600 registrants and one “we-tahd” hand-scribbler from Wasila, and the contrast in news media coverage is astonishing. The news media - including progressive talk radio and blogs - have been crowing about the big Tea Party “movement” for days now. USA Today has taken a poll about a Tea Party candidate’s viability in presidential elections.

In short, what we are seeing is a mind-boggling double-standard, and a wholehearted swallowing of right-wing propaganda as fact, in an American news media whose mathematics deem 1 Tea Party member to be greater than 4000 human rights marchers.

I always appreciate analyses that attempt to look behind the headlines, ask and even explain why something is a headline in the first place. Alisa Valdes provides just such a thing and dares to challenge the notion that the Tea Party "movement" is a movement at all.

She does this by comparing it to the much larger demonstrations by Latinos across the nation who marched for immigrant rights in 2006. Valdes's post is full of some good zingers but more than that, she reminds us that the stories we hear aren't simply based on the events behind them, but they're made by the people who tell them and who so often choose not to tell something else.

Obama: a year in black & white. Who says race doesn't matter? (my article in the UK independent)

In the beginning there was Shelby Steele, who in December 2007 had the audacity to release a book titled A Bound Man: Why We Are Excited About Obama and Why He Can’t Win. Other pundits shared the same sentiment in broadcast commentary, newspaper columns and online, but Steele went the furthest in committing a gross underestimation of candidate Barack Obama and of the American people who would elect him. Just one month after publication, Obama shook the world when he won the Iowa caucuses, and one year later, he was inaugurated as president. Steele and other professional opinion peddlers were proven devastatingly wrong, and the suddenness of this proof is but one example of how the presidency of Barack Obama has made the conversation about race in America more unpredictable than ever before.

The election of the first half-black president – which in America means its first black president – raised expectations and uncertainties about how this country would, perhaps for the first time in a while, begin to wrestle with the question of race in new ways. Would Obama’s presidency lead to unprecedented enlightenment, respect and candour around the topic of race? Would it provoke a backlash and release an uglier, more shameful conversation generally held in private? Would it fulfil the hopes and dreams of the Civil Rights Movement? Would it lead to a rush by white Americans to acquire more black friends?

Given the speed with which our modern society moves, however, one year is too inadequate an amount of time with which to render any final, meaningful verdict on the change in attitudes of Americans toward race. What it does offer, beyond the symbolism of an anniversary and the obligatory conclusion-drawing demanded by such symbolism, is an opportunity to look for hints of trends, to analyse some of the behaviour among the country’s media and political class (both of whom affect wider public opinion by setting the rules and range of public debate) and to ground both of these, to the extent possible, in actual measures of public opinion.

The editors at the UK independent asked me to write on the subject of: have American attitudes toward race have changed in Obama's first year? Obviously it's a mixed bag, but I tried to address some of the more interesting points our our nation's journey of racial discourse in about 2,500 words.